Sponsor Banner

Collapse

Euphonium Upgrades

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Micah.Dominic.Parsons-OFFLINE
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2020
    • 217

    Euphonium Upgrades

    Hello everyone,

    I have always been interested in how much more can be developed for the Euphonium in terms of instrument design. We have such a innovative community which has shown us the benefits of Heavy Valve Top and Bottom Caps, Sterling Sliver, Yellow Brass and Red Brass Bells as well as smaller changes such as the slight alteration to the third valve slide. I often wonder if there is anything else left to discover.

    I wondered if more can be done to the leadpipe of the instrument perhaps using different plating options on the inside or outside of the leadpipe or even adding rifling into the leadpipe. I am always amazed at the technology being developed for the Euphonium and I wonder how much further this can be pushed.

    The Euphonium over the course of the past twenty years has really developed with the addition of larger bells and trigger systems often to the point where each instrument manufacturer has a number of different standard euphonium's taking into account all potential options. I often wonder if there is a simple and obvious change that could be made which we are missing.

    It would be great to see what has actually been tried and tested on the euphonium and to see what prototypes have been created to test out these new features. I did hear about a prototype Besson Prestige which tested a few features but know very little about this.

    Many Thanks

    Micah Dominic Parsons
  • TheJH
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 339

    #2
    Good question. I honestly have no idea what else could be invented. As you said, there's already been a lot of experimentation with different metals and brass alloys, bigger bells, tuning slide triggers, slight repositioning of valve slides, heavy valve caps, etc. Different types of valves like trombones are kinda out of the question since professional euphs are, afaik, pretty much bound to piston valves because of the compensating system. The Adjustable Gap Receiver made by Adams is also a thing already.

    the only thing I could maybe think of would be differently tapered leadpipes, like you have with trumpets?
    Euphoniums
    2008 Willson 2960TA Celebration
    1979 Boosey & Hawkes Sovereign (Round Stamp)
    Mouthpiece: Denis Wick SM4
    Baritone
    1975 Besson New Standard
    Mouthpiece: Courtois 10

    Comment

    • Micah.Dominic.Parsons-OFFLINE
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2020
      • 217

      #3
      Hello,

      That is a really interesting idea with tapered leadpipes! That would be a really interesting combination to have a play around with, I am curious if leadpipes in different materials could also be a thing in the future.

      Many Thanks,

      Micah Dominic Parsons

      Comment

      • davewerden
        Administrator
        • Nov 2005
        • 11136

        #4
        Adams has the adjustable-gap receiver (AGR) as mentioned above. They offer many options in material, including alloy and thickness. You can get vented valves now if you want, and I believe those are standard on the Miraphone 5050. I know Adams made some horns with sterling silver leadpipes, but that is not an option they prefer. Still, for some players it might be a good thing. Forum moderator Doug Ruby has one of the prototypes Adams built with top-sprung, short-action valves.

        I'm waiting to test the Adams Sonic euphonium, which is built like an E1 but is non-compensating. That could be an interesting option for some players at about half the price of the E1/2/3.

        And Wessex has made a new, affordable model of 4-valve compensating front-action valves, not to mention a compensating double-bell euphonium.
        Dave Werden (ASCAP)
        Euphonium Soloist, U.S. Coast Guard Band, retired
        Adams Artist (Adams E3)
        Alliance Mouthpiece DC3, Wick 4AL, Wick 4ABL
        YouTube: dwerden
        Facebook: davewerden
        Twitter: davewerden
        Instagram: davewerdeneuphonium

        Comment

        • daruby
          Moderator
          • Apr 2006
          • 2217

          #5
          Originally posted by davewerden View Post
          Forum moderator Doug Ruby has one of the prototypes Adams built with top-sprung, short-action valves.
          miketeachesclass (forum member ID) also has an E3 with SS bell, trigger, and top sprung short action valves. He originally had the same horn with regular valves and then purchased the new one so he could try them out in parallel. He sold his original horn to Jake Guilbo (also forum member). SO, there is at least one "production" Adams with the new short action valves.
          Adams E3 0.60 Sterling bell - Prototype top sprung valves
          Concord Band
          Winchendon Winds
          Townsend Military Band

          Comment

          • daruby
            Moderator
            • Apr 2006
            • 2217

            #6
            I might add that "heavier is better" vs. "lighter is better" has gone through some extremes over the last 15 years. Examples of "heavy" horns include Sterling Virtuoso, Miraphone 5050, Adams E2, certain Geneva models, and perhaps others. Adams E1 and E3 have specifically tended to get a "big" sound with a lighter horn that seem to emphasize responsiveness.
            Adams E3 0.60 Sterling bell - Prototype top sprung valves
            Concord Band
            Winchendon Winds
            Townsend Military Band

            Comment

            • Micah.Dominic.Parsons-OFFLINE
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2020
              • 217

              #7
              Hello everyone,

              That is really interesting to hear. I know that Adams and Sterling both have quite a few options for customising their Euphoniums. I think a big thing that makes me wary of moving to anyone other than Besson is the mechanics of the instruments. I love the valve action of my Besson Prestige Euphonium and the colour of the sound just perfectly fits the brass band but I am curious to explore this option of leadpipes in a different material.

              Many Thanks,

              Micah Dominic Parsons

              Comment

              • daruby
                Moderator
                • Apr 2006
                • 2217

                #8
                Micah,

                True that the mechanics of the German Besson's are very good and build quality generally better than English Bessons. I had one of the first 2051's imported into the US. It had a 2006 serial number but was tested by Steve Mead in January 2007. I sold it a few years after I purchased my Sterling in 2008.

                I know you once owned a Sterling and had some issues. I have an earlier (than yours) Sterling with Bauerfeind valves. After 11+ years, I have valves and trigger mechanism both working beautifully. The valves are easily the equal of my 2007 Prestige, the tigger, though, is a bit less robust. I have no experience with newer Geneva's but I also own an Adams E3. The mechanics of the Adams is superior and it is easier for me to play as I approach 70 years old. I keep the Sterling, though, because it is my "baby".

                Unless you are a sponsored Besson artist, I strongly suggest you consider auditioning an Adams. The mechanics and ergonomics are superb. A downside with both Adams and Sterling is that they cannot offer the kind of sponsorship packages that Besson can, so that may be a factor. Also Adams (in particular) has no sponsorship deals with any British Championship bands like Sterling, Geneva, and Besson do.

                Doug
                Adams E3 0.60 Sterling bell - Prototype top sprung valves
                Concord Band
                Winchendon Winds
                Townsend Military Band

                Comment

                • Micah.Dominic.Parsons-OFFLINE
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2020
                  • 217

                  #9
                  Hello Doug,

                  Thank you so much for your message. You are totally correct. I have played on both an English Besson Prestige Euphonium and when I compare it to my German Besson Prestige Euphonium it is a totally different beast. I just love the sound and mechanics of my German made Besson Prestige Euphonium but it would be great to look at how instrument design has changed in the past five years since I bought my last instrment.

                  I always loved the look of your Sterling Virtuoso and they are a fine instrument to play! The sound was just incredible! I should start to have a look again at Sterling Virtuoso. I have to admit I have never seen an Adams Euphonium played in a British Brass Band but again the same could be said of the Yamaha Neo, most British Euphonium Players are using a Besson Prestige Euphonium, Geneva Euphonium or Sterling Euphonium. I know in my band we have two Besson Prestige Euphonium's, Two Sovereign Baritones (both with 4th Valves) and a Sterling Baritone.

                  I hope you are well Doug and I hope we can catch up soon.

                  Many Thanks,

                  Micah Dominic Parsons

                  Comment

                  • spkissane
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 226

                    #10
                    Originally posted by davewerden View Post
                    I know Adams made some horns with sterling silver leadpipes, but that is not an option they prefer.
                    Any idea why that is, Dave? More difficult to manufacture?

                    My particular E1 was already made with the SS leadpipe, and honestly I've never had a horn I enjoy playing more. Now, whether or not the leadpipe is the sole cause of that is certainly up for debate, but out of all the horns at ITEC, it was the one I fell in love with.
                    Sean Kissane
                    Low Brass Specialist, Paige's Music
                    Principal Euphonium, Indianapolis Brass Choir
                    Principal Euphonium, Crossroads Brass Band

                    Comment

                    • davewerden
                      Administrator
                      • Nov 2005
                      • 11136

                      #11
                      Originally posted by spkissane View Post
                      Any idea why that is, Dave? More difficult to manufacture?

                      My particular E1 was already made with the SS leadpipe, and honestly I've never had a horn I enjoy playing more. Now, whether or not the leadpipe is the sole cause of that is certainly up for debate, but out of all the horns at ITEC, it was the one I fell in love with.
                      If memory serves, it was because attacks could be less clear. But that would bother you or not bother you, depending on your own style, preferences, and attacks. The horn had been displayed in the Twin Cities a month before ITEC and I had a chance to play it. I did not notice a problem, but I have an attack that is too strong for my tastes (I often found my attacks would overload the mics or electronics when I recorded solos with the Coast Guard Band. Because I have been playing an E3 for a while, I could not say that I could appreciate the positive qualities it might have brought to the table. I find it not at all surprising that you like it so much, though. Different strokes and all that! Possibly if I did more extensive testing I might have the same preference.
                      Dave Werden (ASCAP)
                      Euphonium Soloist, U.S. Coast Guard Band, retired
                      Adams Artist (Adams E3)
                      Alliance Mouthpiece DC3, Wick 4AL, Wick 4ABL
                      YouTube: dwerden
                      Facebook: davewerden
                      Twitter: davewerden
                      Instagram: davewerdeneuphonium

                      Comment

                      • Micah.Dominic.Parsons-OFFLINE
                        Senior Member
                        • Jun 2020
                        • 217

                        #12
                        Hello everyone,

                        This is really interesting to hear, I think I should check out the Adams Euphonium, I have never really seen one live before so I am rather curious to find out more.

                        Many Thanks,

                        Micah Dominic Parsons

                        Comment

                        • John Morgan
                          Moderator
                          • Apr 2014
                          • 1884

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Micah.Dominic.Parsons View Post
                          Hello everyone,

                          This is really interesting to hear, I think I should check out the Adams Euphonium, I have never really seen one live before so I am rather curious to find out more.

                          Many Thanks,

                          Micah Dominic Parsons
                          Indeed you should!! They are fantabulous instruments. And I have owned two Besson Prestige euphoniums in the past.
                          John Morgan
                          The U.S. Army Band (Pershing's Own) 1971-1976
                          Adams E3 Custom Series Euphonium, 1956 B&H Imperial Euphonium,
                          1973 F. E. Olds & Son Studio Model T-31 Baritone
                          Adams TB1 Tenor Trombone, Yamaha YBL-822G Bass Trombone
                          Year Round Except Summer:
                          Kingdom of the Sun (KOS) Concert Band, Ocala, FL (Euphonium)
                          KOS Brass Quintet (Trombone, Euphonium)
                          Summer Only:
                          Rapid City Municipal Band, Rapid City, SD (Euphonium)
                          Rapid City New Horizons Band (Euphonium)

                          Comment

                          • Micah.Dominic.Parsons-OFFLINE
                            Senior Member
                            • Jun 2020
                            • 217

                            #14
                            Hello John,

                            I have to admit that I have had a lifelong relationship with Besson and I think the instruments they are producing now are just the best I have ever seen but it will be interesting to try these other brands too!

                            Many Thanks,

                            Micah Dominic Parsons

                            Comment

                            • bbocaner
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2009
                              • 1449

                              #15
                              Agreed that the instruments Besson are making now are the best instruments that they have ever made. I don't understand the nostalgia that exists in some circles around the round stamps.

                              I think current Besson euphoniums play great. (I'm less enthusiastic about their baritones.) They aren't perfect, absolutely no instrument is, and it's a matter of balancing the good and bad factors of different marques against each other. I like the response and timbre of besson instruments a lot, and they are generally really well made. The valves are fantastic. Intonation is less great but it's workable. The absolute deciding factor for me is the absolutely abysmal level of customer service we get for Besson instruments here in the US. It's very difficult to get parts like felts, valve guides, those rubber damper things, springs. And Besson/Buffet Crampon doesn't seem to care at all that it's hard to get. That's a deal breaker.
                              --
                              Barry

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X