Sponsor Banner

Collapse

Besson 967 Sovereign, british vs german

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • joshealejo
    Member
    • Jul 2016
    • 113

    Besson 967 Sovereign, british vs german

    Hello!

    I am very sorry if this topic has been spoken already, but I cannot find much information about this comparison. I know that this is a very subjetive question but, wich would you prefer? the german 2007+ version or the 2006,2000- version if you were looking for an used? In terms of sound, intonation, response, wich are the characteristics of each version? Are the parts like valve buttons, valve caps upper and bottom are interchangeble between those? Am I able to buy heavy valve caps from the prestige and put on the old sovereing? Is there any way to know from picture wich model is wich without asking for the serial number? For example I have noticed that the right handrest is melted (?) to the uppper bow of the instrument whereas It is suspended and soldered on the german model.Is this a good way? Or there are british sovereigns that have the hand rest separated from the bow aswel?

    https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Yy...Q=w503-h750-no

    This is handrest that, just by looking at It, I am assuming that is from a later Sovereign made in germany. Please correct me if I am wrong.

    Thank you so much!
    Jose
    Some stuff
  • bbocaner
    Senior Member
    • May 2009
    • 1449

    #2
    There's a lot of questions packed in there...

    -Overall, I like the post-2007 German ones better.
    -between 2000ish and 2007 parts were made in germany (keilwerth-schreiber) and assembled in UK with the original UK tooling. They may have even shifted the actual assembly to Germany near the end. I think these are the worst of the bunch. This was a saxophone factory that was just getting their feet wet with brass instrument manufacturing. I think somewhere in here is where the handrest changed.
    -most parts are not interchangeable between post-2007 and pre-2007 instruments. Valve caps I'm pretty sure are different threads. Dawkes music in the UK used to have a decent supply of pre-2007 parts, but those are starting to thin out and they are starting to get some german parts now, too. It can be really difficult to get the german-made parts and consumables here in the US.
    -I think the sound of the german ones is a little lighter than most of the UK-built ones but they also respond easier and are generally just better quality. If you really want the biggest most "british" sound quality you can't beat a round-stamp sovereign - but I find them to be a little more cumbersome to play, the german ones are a little more towards an "international" type of sound and are pretty effortless relatively speaking.
    -intonation on the german ones is marginally better than the older ones but it still has the same tendencies.

    I'd have to look at some photos to see if there's an easy way to tell just from photos.
    --
    Barry

    Comment

    • daruby
      Moderator
      • Apr 2006
      • 2217

      #3
      The handrest changed with the introduction of the 967GS (full floating leadpipe) in the mid 90's. The Round stamps had the early handrest and the metal tab valve guides. Then Besson switched in the mid-later 80's to the later style plastic guides but the leadpipe was still soldered to the bell and it had the early style handrest. The German built horns are based on the 967GS design. One change that I do NOT like in the newest German sovereigns is that the 1st valve compensating loop no longer has a removable slide.

      Other than what I have described, Barry summed it up quite nicely.
      Adams E3 0.60 Sterling bell - Prototype top sprung valves
      Concord Band
      Winchendon Winds
      Townsend Military Band

      Comment

      • Simes
        Member
        • May 2016
        • 111

        #4
        I always found the 967GS to be flimsily built, ergonomically poor and with a very brittle sound. The 1980s Sovereigns were much better - not least due to the fact they still had the lead pipe soldered to the bell which to me increases the intensity of the sound. I’d still got for a round stamp Boosey though. Better built and made of better brass (B&H changed supplier when the Sovereign became a Besson rather than a Boosey). My experience of German Besson isn’t good either, but I won’t bore you with that.
        1983 Boosey & Hawkes Sovereign
        Denis Wick SM4 (original series)

        Comment

        • RickF
          Moderator
          • Jan 2006
          • 3869

          #5
          Originally posted by daruby View Post
          [snip]One change that I do NOT like in the newest German sovereigns is that the 1st valve compensating loop no longer has a removable slide.
          Wow, that would be a game changer for me. Not only for cleaning, but for me it offers me a quick access to oil the first valve during rehearsal or concert. With the horn laying on my lap (bell facing my left) I can pull that slide and add some oil if necessary.
          Last edited by RickF; 10-16-2019, 09:28 AM.
          Rick Floyd
          Miraphone 5050 - Warburton BJ / RF mpc

          "Always play with a good tone, never louder than lovely, never softer than supported." - author unknown.
          Symphonic Band of the Palm Beaches

          El Cumbanchero (Raphael Hernandez, arr. Naohiro Iwai)
          The Cowboys (John Williams, arr. James Curnow)
          Festive Overture(Dmitri Shostakovich)

          Comment

          • bbocaner
            Senior Member
            • May 2009
            • 1449

            #6
            Originally posted by daruby View Post
            The handrest changed with the introduction of the 967GS (full floating leadpipe) in the mid 90's.
            No, it didn't. It was quite a bit later that the handrest changed. Might have been late 90s or it might have coincided with the start of parts production in Markneukirchen, but there are lots of examples of late 1993-on floating-leadpipe "GS" instruments with the older style handrest.

            Like this one, which would seem to be from 1995:

            https://www.ebay.com/itm/Used-Besson...-/293230032849

            Or this one listed here I just noticed, which the seller claims is 1997:

            http://www.dwerden.com/forum/showthr...e#.Xacyl-hKhaQ
            Last edited by bbocaner; 10-16-2019, 10:11 AM.
            --
            Barry

            Comment

            • bbocaner
              Senior Member
              • May 2009
              • 1449

              #7
              The other thing that changed in late 1993 when they started making the "GS" instruments is instead of individually hand fitting each piston to the casing, they had a machine that could purportedly finish the pistons to a very accurate specification outside of the instrument, so when it came time to join them up it was "one size fits all". This was heralded as a big quality improvement, but I believe it was just a cost-saving measure in disguise. You can see the finish of the pistons from this era is different, though. I think it meant that there weren't as many really bad ones (because of poorly fit valves) but there weren't any really exceptional ones (because of really well fit valves) either.
              --
              Barry

              Comment

              • davewerden
                Administrator
                • Nov 2005
                • 11136

                #8
                Originally posted by bbocaner View Post
                The other thing that changed in late 1993 when they started making the "GS" instruments is instead of individually hand fitting each piston to the casing, they had a machine that could purportedly finish the pistons to a very accurate specification outside of the instrument, so when it came time to join them up it was "one size fits all". This was heralded as a big quality improvement, but I believe it was just a cost-saving measure in disguise. You can see the finish of the pistons from this era is different, though. I think it meant that there weren't as many really bad ones (because of poorly fit valves) but there weren't any really exceptional ones (because of really well fit valves) either.
                I'm not a Besson history expert, but I was a Besson Artist from 1980-90-ish. I think the last new Sovereign I received was in the mid 1980's, maybe in 86 or so. On that horn they had used the system you refer to, I think. I had a name like micro-bore or some such lingo. The idea was that the instruments were made and the valves were made and then all was put together without further fitting. I know I needed a replacement piston at some point and they just sent me one, which I put in with no problem.
                Dave Werden (ASCAP)
                Euphonium Soloist, U.S. Coast Guard Band, retired
                Adams Artist (Adams E3)
                Alliance Mouthpiece DC3, Wick 4AL, Wick 4ABL
                YouTube: dwerden
                Facebook: davewerden
                Twitter: davewerden
                Instagram: davewerdeneuphonium

                Comment

                • bbocaner
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2009
                  • 1449

                  #9
                  Interesting. It thought was explained to me at the time as being an "innovation" that was introduced with the GS instruments, but it's possible I'm misremembering or that I misunderstood them at the time.
                  --
                  Barry

                  Comment

                  • daruby
                    Moderator
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 2217

                    #10
                    Originally posted by bbocaner View Post
                    No, it didn't. It was quite a bit later that the handrest changed. Might have been late 90s or it might have coincided with the start of parts production in Markneukirchen, but there are lots of examples of late 1993-on floating-leadpipe "GS" instruments with the older style handrest.
                    I learn something every day. I must say I liked the old handrest better. In fact MUCH better. Never had to have it re-soldered to the inner or outer branches and I preferred the positioning. Every horn since my 1980 round stamp (My 2007 Prestige, my Sterling, my 2001 Sovereign, and my Adams E3) have all had one end or the other come unsoldered on me, always during a performance!

                    Doug
                    Last edited by daruby; 10-17-2019, 08:59 AM.
                    Adams E3 0.60 Sterling bell - Prototype top sprung valves
                    Concord Band
                    Winchendon Winds
                    Townsend Military Band

                    Comment

                    • joshealejo
                      Member
                      • Jul 2016
                      • 113

                      #11
                      Thank you so much for all the information! You can´t simply find this kind of information in the web. I have read that there are people that still prefer the old Round stamp Sovereign due to the sound. What about the old B&H Imperial/Besson 767 (assuming is the same horn with different engraving)? can we say that those are the equivalent to the modern Sovereign 968? Is the medium /euro/british reciver prefered on the older ones? How well does the Imperial plays against a 968?

                      Again, too many questions, but this is a very interesting topic. Thank you again for showing up with your knowledge gentlemen.

                      Greetings from Peru,
                      Jose
                      Some stuff

                      Comment

                      • charger
                        Junior Member
                        • Nov 2007
                        • 11

                        #12
                        As far as I know the handrest changed with introduction of the Prestige, also Sovereigns made after this had the main tuning slide without the brace obviously to save costs. My band provided 2015 Prestige still has the removable first valve compensating loop slide.
                        2015 Besson Prestige 2052 - Denis Wick SM3U
                        1990 Besson 982 - Bach 24AW
                        1992 Bach 42B - Denis Wick 4BL

                        Comment

                        • joshealejo
                          Member
                          • Jul 2016
                          • 113

                          #13
                          An 11 inches bell imperial would sound near (or maybe very close/equal) to a germann beritone or french saxhorn due to the smaller bell and smaller bore(if It does have smaller bore, I m not that sure about the measurement of the bore)?
                          Some stuff

                          Comment

                          • MichaelSchott
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2012
                            • 474

                            #14
                            Originally posted by joshealejo View Post
                            An 11 inches bell imperial would sound near (or maybe very close/equal) to a germann beritone or french saxhorn due to the smaller bell and smaller bore(if It does have smaller bore, I m not that sure about the measurement of the bore)?
                            Do you mean by German Baritone the rotary valve horn with bell off to the side? If so I don’t equate the sound of any euphonium to that sound. The Imperial sound is like a smaller Prestige. A bit lighter than a 12” bell horn.

                            Comment

                            • ydave
                              Member
                              • Oct 2007
                              • 142

                              #15
                              I have an imperial a round stamp an eminence and ive just sold my prestige. So i know how they compare .... for me.
                              Without a doubt i preffer a round stamp accross theboard for all except intonation. Im still waiting for something to blow and sound like one!
                              after that ipreffer a 90s sov built on a monday (they varried) after this the next decade but only if you got a good one... there were a lot of badens. And the prestige wieghed a ton. The German prestige is a fantastic compromise and perfectfor most modern brass banders..... but for me its too bright and can get edgy under extreme volume...... but only as most of my formative years were on rounstamps. German sovs are very eqsy to blow and can sound very sweet but because of what im used to they seem extrmely bright. Ivejust gone gack on my York Eminece, which to me is essentially the same as a british prestige onna good day! Post on this comng to forum near you....
                              Current Euphs:
                              York Eminence
                              Boosey & Hawkes Sovereign (Round Stamp/ Globe)
                              Boosey & Hawkes Imperial
                              Plus an attic of old classics in various states of repair!
                              Previous Euphs:

                              Besson Prestige (German)
                              Geneva Symphony
                              Wilson 2900 with Eminence leadpipe
                              Sterling Virtuoso (300 mm heavy red brass bell)
                              Cortios 167 II
                              'Gob Iron': Doug Elliott Euph 104 I 9s (plus a few others!)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X