Sponsor Banner

Collapse

Euph mouthpiece comparison

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mikeflight14
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2018
    • 5

    Euph mouthpiece comparison

    Conn 5g vs Schilke 51d vs Bach 5g vs DEG bb1?
  • dsurkin
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 526

    #2
    Originally posted by Mikeflight14 View Post
    Conn 5g vs Schilke 51d vs Bach 5g vs DEG bb1?
    The BB1 is a tweaked 51D. The diameter on both is similar, and slightly smaller than the 5G, if I remember correctly. I have heard that Conn 5G dimensions were not so consistent from year to year, but I don't know if you're talking about new Conn or a vintage one.
    Dean L. Surkin
    Mack Brass MACK-EU1150S, BB1 mouthpiece
    Bach 36B trombone; Bach 6.5AL and Faxx 7C mouthpieces (pBone on loan to granddaughter)
    Steinway 1902 Model A, restored by AC Pianocraft in 1988; Kawai MP8, Yamaha KX-76
    See my avatar: Jazz (the black cockapoo; RIP) and Delilah (the cavapoo) keep me company while practicing

    Comment

    • JasonDonnelly
      Member
      • Nov 2015
      • 89

      #3
      Have you tried any or all of these mouthpieces? That's the only way to know how well they work for you.

      For what it's worth, more euphonium players today probably use a Schilke 51D more than any of the others you listed. The BB1 is quite similar to the 51D. Bach 5G is not particularly popular among pro and college players, but many high-school students use them with great success (I did for quite some time). I do not personally know of any players, euphonium or trombone, than use a Conn mouthpiece.
      University of Miami - BM Euphonium Performance '21
      Indiana University - MM Bass Trombone and Euphonium Performance '24



      Besson Prestige 2052S
      Courtois 551BHRA
      Conn 88HCLSGX
      Various Greg Black mouthpieces

      Comment

      • EuphGuy
        Member
        • Apr 2007
        • 105

        #4
        I have a Schilke 51d and a BB1. They play and sound very similar, but I find the Schilke much more comfortable.....the inner rim of the BB1 feels sharper and I find it a bit more taxing in terms of endurance. Every time I get the BB1 out to play around with, I end up going back to the Schilke.

        I personally havent tried a Bach 5g, but I play with a guy who uses one on a Willson and gets a nice tone. I do own a King/UMI 5g and quite like it and can get a nice euph tone like on my Schilke, but the King/UMI seems to have a larger backbore and deeper cup than other brand 5g....don’t know if the Conn is the same as the King/UMI (same parent company).
        Last edited by EuphGuy; 07-10-2018, 03:46 PM.

        Comment

        • mbrooke
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2006
          • 401

          #5
          Originally posted by Mikeflight14 View Post
          Conn 5g vs Schilke 51d vs Bach 5g vs DEG bb1?
          The BB1 is slightly deeper and less "U"-shaped than the 51d and has a more open backbore. The rim is much sharper than the 51d, and feels less comfortable. The rim also feels smaller than the 51d, even though it is supposed to be larger. Regarding sound, I find the BB1 to be more "open" and have more "presence", but it lacks that sweet, velvety 51d sound.

          Comment

          • daruby
            Moderator
            • Apr 2006
            • 2217

            #6
            I play a Wick 4AL on euph, but use the Bach 5G on English baritone or my older Conn Connsetallation 24I American baritone.
            Adams E3 0.60 Sterling bell - Prototype top sprung valves
            Concord Band
            Winchendon Winds
            Townsend Military Band

            Comment

            Working...
            X