Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: DC3 v. SM4U/X

  1. #11
    I played an SM4X and felt the rim was sharper than I liked.

    I moved to the DC3 and really liked the rim contour, but felt the throat was small, and I couldnít use air the way I prefer.

    I have now moved to the K&G 3.5 and am very happy with it.

    The SM4XR is not a good place to go for a typical contemporary sound, in my opinion.

    Quote Originally Posted by Euphjuwan View Post
    So it has been a while, but in the time between my initial post and now, I have been playing on the SM4X mouthpiece. I fell in love with the tone that the mouthpiece produced, but the sharpness of the rim (which I was warned about) has not been fun to deal with. I am a high school student, so as we are beginning to prepare for contest and festival, it is becoming increasingly evident that SM4X that I am playing on will not fare well for me to perform with good stamina and consistency, especially with our program/concert set. (When Jesus Wept, Symphonic Suite from on the Waterfront, and the Free Lance March).

    All of that being said, I am looking to switch to a mouthpiece that can provide a similar tone and feel as the SM4X, but with a less sharp rim. I am reading that K&G mouthpiece are doing well for a lot of people, so those have sparked my curiosity, as well as the new SM4XR. Any advice/ testimonies about these products or any other products will be much appreciated!
    Mike Taylor
    Adams E3 - SS Bell/Brushed Lacquer
    Besson BE2056 Baritone
    Yamaha YBH-301M Marching Baritone
    Illinois Brass Band
    Red Shield Brass Band
    Fox Valley Brass Band
    Star United Mini Corps

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by miketeachesclass View Post
    The SM4XR is not a good place to go for a typical contemporary sound, in my opinion.
    Mike,

    Could you please elaborate on why you feel this way? Have you played the XR, and if so, how would you describe the sound? Thanks.

    JP

  3. #13
    Yes, I have the XR, and played it for a few days.

    I feel itís small, and sounds significantly brighter than any of the rest of the SM series. It also lacks core of sound for me.

    As always, YMMV, but it was very easily disqualified for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by JP View Post
    Mike,

    Could you please elaborate on why you feel this way? Have you played the XR, and if so, how would you describe the sound? Thanks.

    JP
    Mike Taylor
    Adams E3 - SS Bell/Brushed Lacquer
    Besson BE2056 Baritone
    Yamaha YBH-301M Marching Baritone
    Illinois Brass Band
    Red Shield Brass Band
    Fox Valley Brass Band
    Star United Mini Corps

  4. After reading what everyone had to say I decided to give the Wick 4AL a go. I have been using it for about 2 days now and what I can say is that it is definitely a more comfortable mouthpiece to play on than the SM4X.That being said, the tone quality that I produce playing on the 4AL is just not as rich as it is on the SM4X, in my opinion. I am at a bit of a crossroads now, Iím not sure if I want to explore other options or give myself more time on what I am currently using.

  5. #15
    I find the Wick 4AL has a bigger, more open sound. If you compare 2 mouthpieces in a small room, you will generally prefer the smaller. If you have not already done so, try the 2 in a nice, large room (similar to where you might perform) and see what you think.
    Dave Werden (ASCAP)
    Euphonium Soloist, U.S. Coast Guard Band, retired
    Adams E3, Denis Wick 4AL (classic)
    Instructor of Euphonium and Tuba
    Twitter: davewerden
    Facebook: davewerden
    YouTube: dwerden
    Owner of TubaEuph.com, DWerden.com

  6. Alright I see. We have an auditorium rehearsal coming up soon, so Iíll arrive early and test this out, thank you very much

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •